“New Constitution Could Undermine Democracy” — Femi Claudius-Cole Warns

The Leader and Chairperson of the Unity Party, Femi Claudius-Cole, has issued a strong warning over the government’s proposed Amendment Act, 2025, describing the bill as a serious threat to Sierra Leone’s democratic future.

In a press statement dated 15 January 2025,  Claudius-Cole said the proposed changes to the Constitution and electoral laws could weaken democratic governance instead of strengthening it.

She argued that any legal reforms concerning elections should expand political participation, promote transparency, and build public trust — principles she believes the bill fails to uphold.

According to the Unity Party leader, the bill introduces confusing and contradictory provisions regarding first-round victories, run-off elections, court petitions, and fresh elections. She warned that unclear laws could lead to prolonged legal battles and political instability, as candidates may exploit loopholes to delay outcomes.
“Confusion undermines elections as much as fraud does,” she stated.

Claudius-Cole further cautioned that the introduction of multiple rigid timelines for petitions and court processes could open the door for legal obstruction. She said repeated challenges could prevent the country from achieving timely and credible election results.

She pointed out that one of the most controversial elements of the proposed bill is the provision that could allow the deregistration of political parties that fail to win elections. She warned that such a move would shrink political space, weaken opposition parties, and reduce voter choice.

Political parties, she argued, serve broader roles beyond winning elections, including civic education, advocacy, and representing minority voices.

The Unity Party leader also expressed concern about what she described as excessive discretionary powers being granted to regulatory bodies such as the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC). She argued that no institution should have the authority to determine which political parties are “relevant” in a democracy.

The statement further criticised the bill for reducing consultation with political parties in key electoral appointments. Mrs. Claudius-Cole stressed that inclusive dialogue is essential for credible elections and public confidence.

She concluded by urging lawmakers, civil society, and citizens to carefully consider the long-term implications of the bill, warning that the proposed amendments could move the country toward political dominance by a few parties rather than strengthening democratic pluralism.