Post a comment 
The administration of Milton Margai Technical University (MMTU) is facing mounting scrutiny following an investigative report that has revealed alleged malpractice in the institution’s recruitment and promotion processes.
The report, compiled by an independent committee chaired by Miriam Conteh-Morgan, outlines allegations of score-sheet tampering, favoritism, and the reported victimization of senior academic staff during recruitment and promotion exercises.
At the centre of the controversy is the Vice Chancellor and Principal of MMTU, Philip John Kanu, who the report states acknowledged responsibility for irregularities identified in the process. According to the committee’s findings, some interview score sheets were allegedly altered using correction tape, after which new marks were inserted.
Investigators further noted instances in which the word “Not” was reportedly written before “Recommended” or “Appointable,” effectively disqualifying certain candidates.
The report indicates that at least eleven lecturers were affected by the disputed recruitment decisions. Among those cited are Christiana Njabu Foday, Prince Gevao, and Solomon Sidy Keddy, whom the committee described as having been unfairly treated during the process.
Attention was also drawn to the university’s Registry, particularly the Human Resources unit. The committee raised concerns about the conduct of the Deputy Registrar for Human Resources, Mrs. Khadiatu Juanah, accusing her of providing misleading statements during the investigation.
Investigators also stated that recommendations made by the Tertiary Education Commission were allegedly ignored. In some instances, individuals holding PhDs were reportedly appointed to positions below the ranks recommended by the commission, while less qualified staff were retained in higher positions.
The report further highlighted the absence of an effective grievance mechanism within the university, which it said compelled affected staff to seek intervention from the Ministry of Technical and Higher Education or the media.
Among its recommendations, the committee called for the reinstatement or re-grading of affected staff, disciplinary action against officials implicated in the process, and reforms to restore democratic elections for Faculty Deans. It also recommended that Prof. Kanu step aside while further investigations are conducted.
The findings are expected to be reviewed by the University Court, which will determine the next steps, including whether further administrative or legal action should be taken.
The situation has sparked broader discussions about governance, accountability, and transparency within Sierra Leone’s higher education system.
