A renowned lawyer, Basita Michael, while criticizing government’s accountability, urged Sierra Leone’s First Lady, Dr. Fatima Bio, to step back and allow designated ministers to handle the ongoing issues between Koidu Limited and its workers.

Basita Michael’s comments came in light of serious allegations against Koidu Limited diamond mining company, including a history of exploitation and human rights violations.

Workers at Koidu Limited have protested against being paid in leones at an outdated exchange rate from 2016, despite the significant depreciation of the currency.

In a recent article, Sierra Leone’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva and Ambassador to Switzerland, Lansana Gberie described this practice as “unconscionable” and “criminal.” Many citizens have pointed out that those issues stem from a poor contract signed by the government, which has allowed for weak oversight and low royalty rates.

Michael indicated that judges in Sierra Leone have faced similar issues regarding their salaries, which are pegged to an unrealistic exchange rate. She argued that if the First Lady finds Koidu’s payment practices objectionable, the government must also address its own shortcomings and compensate judges for years of underpayment.

For the government to credibly demand better practices from foreign companies, Michael criticized that it must first demonstrate a commitment to upholding the rights of its citizens.

She stressed that while Koidu Limited must be held accountable for its contractual breaches and human rights record, the First Lady should allow designated ministers to address those issues through appropriate legal and institutional channels. She urged the government to reflect on its own failures and ensure it prioritizes the rights of its citizens.

As mentioned by Basita Michael, Ambassador Gberie’s recent article underscores Koidu Limited’s failure to meet its commitments, including the undervaluation of diamonds for tax purposes and a lack of accountability for the deaths of two protesters in 2007. The government’s White Paper at the time deflected blame, raising questions about the effectiveness of oversight in such matters.

Michael emphasized a critical irony in the situation, noting that the government itself is guilty of similar failures. “Many government offices lack clean drinking water, and numerous communities also struggle to access this basic necessity.” Michael added.