Director of Public Prosecutions Challenges Police IG Fayia Sellu Over Disparaging Remarks

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has issued a strongly worded letter to the Inspector General of Police. The letter, addressed to the Inspector General, demands evidence to substantiate disparaging remarks made against the Law Officers’ Department.

The controversy stems from remarks made by the Inspector General of Police during a parliamentary session. In his statement, the Inspector General referred to lawyers at the Law Officers’ Department as “Small Small infant lawyers” who he claimed could be compromised. Additionally, he alleged that the DPP does not personally review files submitted by the police but instead assigns them to these purportedly inexperienced lawyers.

Expressing dismay and disappointment at these assertions, the DPP’s letter condemned the remarks as unprofessional, offensive, and demeaning. The letter emphasized the importance of factual accuracy, particularly when discussing public officials or institutions in a public forum.

Seeking accountability, the DPP’s letter outlined three specific requests to the Inspector General of Police:

Identification of “Small Small infant lawyers” susceptible to compromise: The DPP demanded names of lawyers who have allegedly been compromised or are at risk of compromise.

Documentation of overlooked files: The letter also called for information on files that were purportedly not reviewed by the DPP, suggesting potential negligence or oversight within the Law Officers’ Department.

Statistics on drug-related cases: Finally, the DPP requested data on the number of drug-related files forwarded to the Law Office since the beginning of the year, indicating a concern over the handling of such cases.

The letter concluded by setting a deadline for the Inspector General’s response, highlighting the seriousness of the matter and the urgency of a thorough investigation. The demand for evidence underscores the commitment of the DPP to uphold the integrity and professionalism of the legal system in Sierra Leone.

The controversy has sparked widespread debate and scrutiny within both legal and law enforcement circles. Many have voiced support for the DPP’s stance, praising the initiative to challenge baseless accusations and uphold the reputation of the Law Officers’ Department.

Legal experts emphasize the importance of maintaining trust and confidence in the justice system, particularly in the face of unsubstantiated allegations that undermine its credibility. The public awaits the Inspector General’s response, eager to see how the matter will be addressed and whether accountability will be upheld.

The unfolding developments highlight the delicate balance between law enforcement and legal oversight, underscoring the need for mutual respect and cooperation between these key institutions. As the deadline approaches, all eyes are on the Inspector General of Police as he prepares to respond to the Director of Public Prosecutions’ demands for accountability and transparency.