In the ongoing murder trial of Abdul Kpaka, police investigator Andrew Nyaka Amara admitted during cross-examination that no witness or evidence directly linked the accused to the death of Sia Fatu Kamara.
Testifying in court, Amara stated that although the investigation relied on evidence such as a postmortem report and hospital outpatient records, none explicitly implicated Kpaka as the individual responsible for Sia’s death.
He revealed that on August 16, 2024, he and his team visited the Emergency Hospital but failed to obtain statements from the nurses at the time. Statements from medical personnel were only collected later, between August and November, after Kpaka had already been charged with murder.
Amara explained that the decision to charge Kpaka prior to gathering these statements was based on “sufficient evidence” obtained during their initial inquiries, including the postmortem report. However, he admitted that neither the outpatient records nor the postmortem report named Kpaka as a suspect, detailing only the cause of death.
Defense counsel Emmanuel Teddy Koroma criticized the omission of photographs of Sia’s body provided by Princess Wilson, manager of the Virtue Funeral Home, from the case bundle. Koroma argued that these images were essential evidence. Amara countered that the photographs were deemed confidential by Wilson and could only be produced upon request.
Further scrutiny revealed that no forensic examination was conducted at Sia’s residence, where her body was reportedly found. Amara justified this decision, citing that such measures were considered unnecessary at the time. Additionally, a request sent to Dr. Owizz for a postmortem examination inaccurately described Sia as “found lying dead,” which the defense argued misrepresented the case.
Despite Kpaka consistently denying the allegations, Amara maintained that the investigation warranted further action, leading to the murder charge. The court adjourned the trial to Tuesday, November 26, 2024, at 2:30 p.m.
Hmm, God will judge all of you very soon
Aa salone buff case
The media shared the wrong information when this incident happened. Now that the matter is in court, almost all of what was claimed can’t be proven. The worst part of it was our stake-holders taken sides and making public statements, thereby influencing public opinion.
Ghhj
Why the twist in the case ….people interfered based on what the media shared….look now different stories coming up in court ….Let thy will be done !!!
The law is the law, leave the law for those who are lawyering. Case R. v G 1921. Landmark case.