Abdul Fatoma, Chief Executive of the Campaign for Human Rights and Development International (CHRDI), has raised serious concerns about the state of Sierra Leone’s judiciary, citing political interference and severe infrastructure issues.
Speaking during an interview with AYV Media, Fatoma highlighted the deteriorating condition of court facilities, exacerbated by the rainy season, and questioned the judiciary’s independence amid political influence.
Fatoma referenced a recent video released by the judiciary, showing the poor condition of magistrate and court buildings. He noted that while President Julius Maada Bio has acknowledged the urgent need for reforms, six years into his administration, the justice system still lacks the resources required to meet public demand.
Fatoma also criticized the role of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission, which he said plays only an advisory role in judicial appointments, while political influence, especially through the Attorney General (AG), dominates the process. He argued that the AG, a political appointee who sits in Cabinet, complicates the judiciary’s impartiality.
Reflecting on financial autonomy, Fatoma explained that the judiciary no longer controls funds generated from court fines and fees, which are now directed to the government’s Consolidated Fund. He also lamented the bureaucratic delays in hiring independent judges, noting that the process requires approval from the Ministry of Finance and support from the Attorney General, leading to significant setbacks.
Fatoma called for urgent reforms to safeguard the judiciary’s independence, comparing the current system unfavorably with other nations. He emphasized the need for a system that operates without political interference, allowing the judiciary to serve the people impartially.
It is quite correct let the judiciary be independent not political appointment,
Because if someone with same political party have issue in curt they would influence it.