Post a comment
The Judiciary of Sierra Leone has responded forcefully to a recent press release by the Campaign for Human Rights and Development International (CHRDI), which alleges reports of “mistreatment, harassment, discrimination, and abuse” within the country’s judicial system.
In a statement issued by the judiciary, officials asserted that the claims are unfounded and reiterated their commitment to upholding principles of independence, impartiality, equality, accountability, and integrity, as mandated by the Constitution.
The judiciary, led by Acting Chief Justice Nicholas C. Browne-Marke, noted that it remains focused on fulfilling its constitutional duty to administer both civil and criminal justice in a fair and transparent manner. In a direct rebuttal to CHRDI’s allegations, the judiciary highlighted recent initiatives under Justice Browne-Marke’s leadership, including the scheduled transfer of judicial staff for 2024, the handling of backlog cases, and actions to address issues surrounding file reassignment. According to the judiciary, these steps are intended to improve administrative efficiency and ensure the timely delivery of justice.
“The judiciary is committed to its core values and continues to uphold its mission in line with the constitutional mandate,” the statement read. Officials added that any staff conduct deemed counterproductive to the institution’s values may be subject to disciplinary action, underscoring that this is in keeping with practices common to all public institutions.
The judiciary further countered the CHRDI’s allegations, suggesting that certain “ill-motivated citizens” may be engaged in a campaign to undermine the institution’s credibility. The statement implied that some individuals, previously beneficiaries of alleged judicial manipulation, may be disgruntled over recent reforms that have curtailed undue influence over judicial processes. The judiciary cited cases where individuals have refused assignments at their designated stations, underscoring the impartial nature of the current judicial administration.
The statement also called on CHRDI to pursue responsible advocacy and recommended that the organization engage directly with judicial authorities before issuing any “unfounded publications.” Officials noted that CHRDI’s leadership is currently involved in active litigation and emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in civil society’s role within democratic governance.
In conclusion, the judiciary reassured the public of its “unwavering commitment” to upholding the Constitution and delivering justice impartially. It encouraged citizens to remain confident in the judiciary’s dedication to fairness and transparency, while denouncing what it termed as self-serving and misleading attacks aimed at discrediting its efforts.
