Media personality and social activist, Vickie Remoe has raised questions about the former president, Dr. Ernest Bai Koroma’s decision to seek medical treatment in Nigeria rather than the usual European destinations.

Remoe expressed her astonishment, stating, “I was today years old when I learned that Nigeria was a desired destination for medical tourism for Sierra Leonean presidents. Turkey I knew. Germany I knew. UK I knew. Nigeria I did not know.”

The coincidence of President Koroma’s sudden need to go to Nigeria for medical reasons, especially considering ECOWAS’ recent demand for his departure, has raised eyebrows and sparked inquiries into the decision-making process. Remoe emphasizes the need for scrutiny, posing essential questions such as, “Why Nigeria for medical treatment and not the familiar European locations? If Nigerian Presidents opt for London for medical care over their own country, can we be certain that this is the best choice for a Sierra Leonean president?”

Drawing from a personal experience, Remoe shares the story of her father, who was born in Nigeria. When he faced a trial in Sierra Leone and needed medical attention, the family insisted on allowing him to travel to the US, where he had a medical history and a trusted physician. The doctor who had been treating him provided a note supporting the request. However, upon arrival in the US, he was diagnosed with stage 4 prostate cancer, undergoing challenging treatments.

Remoe clarifies her stance on supporting an individual’s right to choose their treatment location but highlights the striking coincidence in President Koroma’s decision, stating, “I will never ever not support someone’s request to get treatment wherever they choose, but the coincidence is coincidensing.”

The juxtaposition of ECOWAS’ recent demands and the unexpected choice of Nigeria for medical treatment adds layers to the unfolding narrative, urging further scrutiny into the circumstances surrounding the former president’s health decisions.