The All People’s Congress (APC) party has in a press release issued on Thursday 23rd March 2023, raised concerns on different issues to the Electoral Commission of Sierra Leone (ECSL) and one major concern is on voter ID cards.

In the press release, they called on ECSL to disclose the exact date of arrival of voter identity cards.

The APC wrote:

“We demand that ECSL disclose to us who the contractor is when the voter identity cards are arriving in Sierra Leone, and their storage and we intend to monitor the card distribution process starting from when they arrive in Sierra Leone”.

Also, it is the case that ECSL acted alone, and somewhat in secrecy, in awarding the contract for the printing of voter identity cards in this electoral cycle. In 2012 and 2017, the process was inclusive where political parties and civil society organizations were not only involved in the procurement of a vendor but also monitored the printing exercise, courier, and distribution process of the cards.

Regrettably, these transparency and confidence-building measures were ostensibly omitted by ECSL in the current electoral cycle. Given that as per the ECSL’s last update, the voter identification cards have not been couriered into Sierra Leone.”

The clarifications and demands have been made in line with the party’s commitment to ensure it has a non-violent democratic and fair election process and outcome.

Inclusive and robust elections management is key in delivering free, fair, and credible elections acceptable to all sides in any democracy but stated that due to recent pronouncement by the ECSL and the party’s experience gained in taking part In by-elections in the past five years, it is on that grounds the party is taking into consideration issued that may destroy credible electoral management system for the June 24th, 2023 Elections.

Of note are the tallying procedures, the disaggregated voter registration figures at polling centers, voter identity card distribution, electoral data management protocols, and the sharing of information by ECSL.

We have been informed by our representatives to the Political Parties Liaison Committee (PPLC) that at the last PPLC meeting, the Commission made a policy statement that tallying of votes for the Presidential Election will only take place at the regional level. We are very much concerned by this statement as it runs contrary to the provision of the extant electoral law as contained in the Public Elections Act 2022. Section 51 thereof provides that “valid votes cast will be counted polling station by polling station and the certified result of the counting shall be transmitted to the District Returning Officer who will, in turn, certify the result and transmit same to the Regional Returning Officer who shall again certify and transmit same to the National Returning Officer”.

The District Returning Officer can’t certify the result of the total votes cast at polling stations in a District and transmit the same to the Regional Returning Officer without any form of tallying taking place. If this is the policy the Commission intends to adopt, then it will be tantamount to laying the foundation for massive electoral malpractice”.

We are very much concerned about this seeming infringement of the law and have requested to the Commission that it clarifies in no uncertain terms the policy it intends to adopt in respect of tallying and transmission of results of votes cast from polling stations to the district and up the chain to the national level.

The APC will reject and resist any attempt to short-cut legally laid down procedures and protocols in the management of the 2023 Elections.

Further, ECSL after registration of voters only published final voter registration figures at national, regional, and district levels and failed to publish disaggregated voter registration figures at the polling center level. We are therefore requesting that the voter registration figures at the polling center level be published immediately not only because transparency and credible elections management demand that, but because it is necessary for aiding the APC’s election preparedness.

These clarifications and demands have been made in line with our Party’s commitment to ensure we have non–a violent, democratic, and fair elections process and outcome.

“We have formally complained and brought to the attention of the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC) certain incendiary statements and falsities uttered by Madam Fatima Bio, the First Lady of Sierra Leone, while she was campaigning for the SLPP in Kailahun District on the 19th of March 2023.

In a video and audio clip being shared widely on social media, the First Lady uttered, amongst many other things, that the APC did not conduct elections during their National Delegates Conference (NDC) but rather did the selection of National Officers, that all our National Officers except two are from villages along Kamakwie Road, that former President Koroma had stated that Kono does not ‘matter’ (is irrelevant) that Former President Koroma has said that he has made sure that the East is not part of the APC, that our entire National Executive consists of only Lokos and Limbas, and most dangerously that APC should not be allowed to have party offices in the East.

These statements are not only false but irresponsible and incendiary. It is open knowledge, with evidence abounding that elections were conducted during our NDC, that our National Executive does not consist only of people along Kamakwie Road, and that Former President Koroma never made a statement about the irrelevance of Kono or the East especially considering how much development he took to the East during his presidency, and that not only Lokos and Limbas constitute our Executive.

Section 39 (1) of the Political Parties Act 2022 provides that “A political party, including its members, supporters, candidates, and operatives shall not be involved in the use of incendiary and inciting statements, including hate speech against political opponents”. A statement that we should not be allowed to have offices in the East is MOST DANGEROUS and inciting and exposes our Party, its property, membership, and supporters in the East to hate, possible attacks, and destruction”.

“We drew the PRC’s to a recent fine the Commission imposed on our Party citing the same provision of the law for statements or chants made by certain persons in the presence of our National Leader, for whom there is no evidence that they are known operatives or members of our Party, but yet still the Commission proceeded, of its own volition, to fall heavily on us, even though the Party through its leadership issued prior statements for people to desist from making incendiary comments.

We waited several days to see what action the Commission would take regarding the utterances of the First Lady, especially so considering how the Commission was proactive in calling us to book when unknown people purported to be our supporters made less incendiary statements, but up till now we have not heard or seen anything from the Commission.

We have admired the Commission Chairman’s leadership and enjoyed his professional collaboration complaint and his dispassionate consideration of this complaint. We believe that what is good for the goose, must be good for the gander”.