OPINION: Court Requesting The Passport of Samura Kamara is Unfair

The courts in Sierra Leone requesting the passports of the leading opposition presidential candidate amount to an unfair practice that is intended to suppress the opposition presidential candidates.

More especially by a judicial system that is known for corruption and a government’s tool for suppressing critics and opposition members.

The government has changed a series of laws to enable them a chance in winning the next elections but the herculean task is to contend with the reality of hyperinflation, human rights violations, and massive allegations of corruption against them.

The government in power should know that there’s no “seize point” in elections they have to go and defend their deeds to the people of Sierra Leone on Election Day.

The request for the passports of the opposition presidential candidate is a clear indication that the government is afraid of the opposition and is willing to use any means necessary to win the upcoming elections.

This is a violation of democratic principles and a threat to the freedom of expression and political participation of the citizens of Sierra Leone.

The government should focus on addressing the real concerns of the people such as the economy, healthcare, education, and infrastructure development rather than suppressing opposition members.

The people of Sierra Leone deserve a transparent and democratic process in which they have the freedom to choose their leader without fear or intimidation.

The international community should closely monitor the situation in Sierra Leone and ensure that the upcoming elections are free, fair, and transparent. Any attempt to suppress opposition members or manipulate the election results should be met with strong condemnation and appropriate actions.

The future of Sierra Leone and its people depends on a democratic process that is built on transparency, accountability, and integrity.